Skip to content

Texans not happy with Keystone XL or TransCanada

January 24, 2011

On January 24th, the Los Angeles Times reported that Texans, among other groups, are outraged with the idea that a pipeline carrying tar sands heavy crude oil with toxic dilution agents is going to run across their land and there isn’t a lot they can do about it.

“Basically, what you’re saying is they’re going to shove it down our throat, whether we want it or not?” Charles Crouch, a former refinery worker, said at a meeting on the pipeline last month in Lufkin. “That’s hard to do in Texas, I’ll tell you. We get riled up, and we’re going to figure out a way to stop this thing.”

“You gotta be kidding!” one man in Tyler shouted when told that the 36-inch pipeline would run hot, corrosive oil through buried steel pipes whose walls are less than half an inch thick.

This is just another group of concerned citizens that joins a long list of people and groups who do not want the government to approve the proposed Keystone XL pipeline. Private property owners in Oklahoma have filed suit again TransCanada and Nebraskans have taken to protesting at the state Capitol to get their voices heard.  The Sierra Club has seen an influx in people, at their most recent meetings, to discuss the pipeline.

Even in Texas, dozens of people showed up at each of the Sierra Club meetings across the state in December, and many stayed on afterward to organize letter-writing campaigns and community resistance councils.

With the opposition to the Keystone XL growing, the State Department will soon decide whether it approves the trans-national pipeline. But the EPA remains adamant that more research is needed to assess the environmental harm that the pipeline will cause.

One Comment leave one →
  1. January 30, 2011 6:49 pm

    ……….The tar sands pits in Alberta Canada that Senators Lindsey Graham R-S.C. Saxby Chambliss R-Georgia and Kay Hagan D-N.C. visited last week are so bleak the hellish wasteland from Lord of the Rings…But Senator Graham after meeting with oil industry representatives and tar sands proponents hailed the toxic mines the source of the worlds dirtiest fuel as adding that the project .. After all Graham and his delegation never met with opponents of the project — like the people living near the tar sands pits who report higher-than-average cancer rates linked to water contamination or biologists or the wildlife experts who counted hundreds of ducks that died after landing on the projects toxic lakes…But you would think plans to expand pipelines carrying this toxic crude into the United States would come under a little more scrutiny from U.S. leaders – especially the ones living in states where pipelines threaten drinking water supplies…Thats why it was so surprising to hear Montana Senator Max Baucus pushing for hasty approval of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline which would carry this toxic oil right into his state traversing major sources of fresh water like the Missouri and Yellowstone Rivers posing a constant threat of ruptures spills and contamination.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: